Female Bosses are Just Headaches!
Author: admin | Filed under: Leadership | Tags: Employers, female, gender, male | 1 Comment »Generally, most of us do not like to work under female bosses. Why? We find that they are over-sensitive to details that in actual fact the details do not contribute real value. Male bosses on the other hand that do not focus on details, they just want to outcome of the task, oversee the emotional aspects of the employees where employees feel the drift away from their bosses. What are the other differences that male and female bosses have?
Male bosses tend to look at the longer outcome, the female bosses tend to look at the shorter outcome – Do you agree with this? Male bosses tend to look at the vision and devise all means of getting there. Generally, they do not spend time focusing on devising the process of getting there (although they do), their objective is not to think about processes. Female bosses will generally look at how to get there instead and devise the every step required. They will tell their employee what exactly to do (something like spoon feeding). This can be counter productive as the female boss maybe spending time irrelevant to overall goal. Furthermore, the employee’s lack of autonomy only result in lower morale due to restricted proposals
They good thing about being careful with every process in reaching the goal is that all things are covered nicely. That is what the female bosses tend to be good at. Female bosses tend to be more meticulous in details. They can check on the missing gaps that are necessary for the overall outcome. However, excessive detailing of the outcome can create unnecessary overhead to the employee. Overhead is also created for the female bosses themselves when they focus too much on the details. They are blinded by the details that they do not see the overall goal anymore. What are the mistakes they can make? They focus too much on grammatical mistakes of the reports, the amount of purchases to make on small insignificant items (e.g. stationary, office equipments).
Lastly, male bosses tend to empower employees, whereas the female bosses tend to oversee and watch over everything little activities in delivering outcome. The good thing about empowerment is that employees can do whatever they can do deliver results. They are not bounded by rules and should work within guidelines. The problem is sometimes, when the male bosses tend to focus on the outcome and empowers everyone, he maybe slowing drifting away from this team and not knowing what they are actually doing on the ground. This can affect morale issue! Female bosses on the other hand, focus on the every little activity, they hand-held you in your tasks, telling you specified instructions to perform. That is good for beginner staff but this is robbing freedom from the employee. Without freedom and autonomy, the employee are restricted in their creative and in the end morale will be affected as they ponder the real purpose of work they are doing…
Now having pointing out these, it seemed that working under a female boss is a dread. We guess is every employee’s preference of who he love to work under. Do you agree with us? Not necessarily all are working in this manner. There will be exceptions and we hope you are one of those lucky ones!
These generalizations are ridiculous and essentializing. You’ve presented no evidence for your claims. Furthermore, what is the goal of a claim like this — that women shouldn’t hold positions of authority? Is that the argument you’re preparing to make? As it, you’re already making a very thinly veiled argument for discrimination in the workplace.